Mi is az a keresőoptimalizálás? SEO = keresőoptimalizálás

I have been working in the keresőoptimalizálás business for very nearly 5 years now. To some I am only a youthful pup, however I should state the outcomes we get from our SEO battles represent themselves.

When you work in this field of SEO you tend to coordinate with other SEO experts and stay tuned with the most recent SEO waves or updates from Google. You additionally communicate with other SEO specialists in the discussions and online journals.

I need to express my worry with the measure of many-sided quality added to the subject of SEO. Around 80% of data on SEO out there is too profound and complex, with a dreadful part of assessments.

Like any innovation or approach, individuals are searching for convenience. They need something which works, makes an impact or has any kind of effect. This same idea applies to SEO=keresőoptimalizálás.

Utilizing an innovation requires staying with the nuts and bolts of that innovation. On the off chance that you filter through the a large number of accessible "sources" you can typically find the genuine source, and this is the data and strategy one should utilize when working out how to go about it. This is the right method to learn and apply anything.

I think that its astounding how some SEO specialists toss their assessments out on their powerful online journals, just to befuddle another thousand SEO specialists.

It is so funny to watch, and it goes this way:

Search engine optimization Expert Joe, needs to get "green carrots" on page 1 of Google for a customer.

He is dealing with it for quite a long time, bookmarking, informal organizations, joins and so on.

Following 2-3 months he makes a stride back and takes a gander at his guest and catchphrase details. Very little change, he simply isn't getting the outcomes and his customer is beginning to ponder.

All of a sudden he understands that a cool video on YouTube may help things up and get's this delivered an on the web.

The next week "green carrots" is on page 1! It's incredible, it worked and the customer is all glad.

In the wake of sitting back casual and taking a gander at his outcomes, he abruptly understands that he never improved the substance of his page with enough catchphrases. Uh oh. He just specified "green carrots" once and still got a page 1 result. This strikes him as peculiar and it appears to damage all that he found out about page enhancement in keresőoptimalizálás = SEO.

What occurs next is fascinating. The SEO master concludes this is important data and experience. He has quite recently observed the accompanying new pursuit lead in play, which ought to be imparted to anybody doing SEO:

"Google is never again giving any an incentive to catchphrase thickness. This has no impact in SEO."

He composes a pleasant 1000 word article about it and because of his experience, is to a great degree sure of his discoveries. He even makes a punch at Google about no specifying it to anybody. Presently he has praise for discovering this out before any other individual.

This is to a great degree disappointing for any individual who needs to take in the subject of SEO or even old school SEO professionals.And is a direct result of this foolishness that the web is loaded with a huge number of pages about SEO which would be better situated in the junk.

Presently don't misunderstand me, I am not discussing the numerous extremely helpful articles, summaries and instructional exercises out there which can significantly help a SEO master to complete his activity speedier. I am discussing those individuals who make their own particular understandings of what is a to a great degree exact and coherent innovation - SEO.

Adding perplexity to the subject

I have a genuine case of this. A week ago I read and article from a "main SEO source", Seomoz. In their article The Basics of Search Engine Friendly Design and Development, they state uproarious and strong that:

"Watchword thickness is, beyond a shadow of a doubt, NOT a piece of present day web internet searcher positioning calculations for the straightforward reason that it gives far more awful outcomes than numerous other, further developed strategies for catchphrase examination."

A significant explanation! Who's your source? They referenced Dr. Edel Garcia's original work on the point - The Keyword Density of Non-Sense. On the off chance that you experience this present source's article, Dr. Edel Garcia tries to separate the scientific condition of watchword thickness enhancing query items and in the closures as far as anyone knows demonstrates it couldn't be valid.

The last articulation in Seomoz's remark on catchphrase thickness is interesting.

"Dr. Garcia's experience in data recovery and his numerical verifications ought to expose any thought that watchword thickness can be utilized to help "upgrade" a page for better rankings. Nonetheless, this same archive outlines the terrible truth about catchphrase enhancement - without access to a worldwide list of site pages (to figure term weight) and an agent corpus of the Internet's gathered reports (to help manufacture a semantic library), we have minimal opportunity to make equations that would be useful for genuine advancement."

What does this all mean? In synopsis, Seomoz told its a huge number of adherents that "Watchword thickness has NO PART in SEO". At that point they say toward the end that they don't approach enough indexed lists (Google's database) to completely approve it. Huh? Why specify it at that point?

Instructions to streamline SEO

On the contrary side of this story, there are numerous keen SEO specialists who work from the wellspring of SEO itself and never veer off. These are a portion of the finest SEO organizations and SEO specialists on the planet.

So back to the point, the basic inquiry waiting on us now is, "Who is the source?".

How about we investigate might we?

Who chooses what positions well?

Who chooses if your substance is great?

Who chooses if your catchphrases coordinate what individuals are searching for?

Who decides whether an outside connection has specialist or esteem?

The appropriate response is basic: Google.

The fascinating thing which I found when conversing with other SEO experts is that they get a kick out of the chance to take after different specialists in light of their portfolios, alluring articles and other interest factors.

However, in the event that you need to get into the quick and dirty of everything, you best wager is to backpedal to source.

Matt Cutts from Google's Search Team gives many recordings, articles and updates to keep SEO specialists like you from falling into the dim pit of fizzled sites.

Google needs quality, they need results and they need an incredible client encounter. The main way they will achieve this is getting SEO organizations and their individual staff to comprehend what their vision is and how they function.

Simply a week ago a youthful SEO organization in London reached us to assume control two coming up short SEO crusades they were running. They had gotten themselves into a wide range of odd-ball SEO hones and were, obviously, fizzling.

Our Campaign Manager basically alluded them to the relevant Google articles on SEO and site quality rules and they are currently back on track.

Outline

When you go over "new and energizing SEO data", set aside the opportunity to confirm it with the different asset sites accessible from Google. Don't simply hop in and trust everything another blogger composed. It could possibly be valid, yet it is your notoriety at stake as a SEO proficient.

I trust this aides in getting your SEO crusades more compelling and by the book.